200 to 1: Is that really a “War”?

I’m going to be very conservative here and say that America lost 5,000 soldiers in Iraq. That number is a little high. I’m also going to say that 1,000,000 Iraqis, including innocents, have been killed since the occupation. That figure is low. However, it is in the general ballpark and it helps make for a good ratio to look at.

That ratio which I am referring to is 200 to 1,… two hundred lives lost on the one hand for every one life lost on the other.

I don’t know about you, but to me that is a pretty big contrast. Here’s a visual to help put it into perspective:


That is roughly what we are looking at,… roughly the amount of Iraqis we kill for every one American soldier that dies.

Can someone explain to me what we are doing in Iraq again? In particular, how is this helping the average American? We know there was no weapons of mass destruction there. Are we getting back at Saddam for forcing Larry Silverstein to demolish WTC7? You know, lots of folks thought Saddam was behind 9/11.

There is another fabulous aspect to this ratio, 200 to 1. Let’s say that 5,000 people died from the events of 9/11. That number is a little high too, but on the other hand, many have also died and are still dying from the toxic dust they inhaled. Either way, the real ratio of Iraqis to 9/11 victims is actually more dramatic than our 200 to 1. But it’s close enough, especially since who's counting all those dead Iraqis we never saw on TV, anyway?

Basically, if we link Iraq to 9/11 like Cheney did, we can say that America has revenged itself 200 times upon this country that had nothing to do with 9/11. But there had to be blood!

This all reminds me of another country mass killing innocents, including with white phosphorus, under the auspices that two soldiers were kidnapped, or that a bottle rocket made contact with one of their buildings 6 months earlier.

White hot flaming rumors incinerate a Gaza residential neighborhood.

Anyway, I guess folks don’t care too much about this kind of thing anyway, now that the economy is taking a dive. Folks don’t seem to mind too much that Obama is about to send more troops into a war that Russia taught us not to fight,… in Afghanistan against a shadowy enemy that didn’t even commit a particular crime that we are fond of accusing them of. But I suppose getting meat on the table takes precedence to all of this. Still, it is kind of awkward that the people behind the war are the same people that bankrupted America. But we don’t talk about that in public,… that would definitely be uncomfortable.

Either way, it’s them and not us, right? Oh, but then there’s that bit about karma too…

The “Final” Report on WTC7 by NIST is a Poorly Constructed Lie

The Final ‘Draft for Public Comment’ Report by NIST, which you can find in a 7.52 MB .pdf document here, is fundamentally flawed, and I am going to explain to you exactly why.

NIST did not conduct a comprehensive investigation into controlled demolition as the root cause for the destruction of WTC7. And yet, a controlled demolition is exactly what it looked like. Consequently, NIST did not even conduct a study using that video of WTC7… that video only surfaced on the Internet on Nov 1st, 2008.

The excuse NIST used for abandoning a comprehensive investigation into controlled demolition is that they did not have any recordings of its collapse that captured what they deemed to be a loud sound. As a Bachelor in Audio Production, I can tell you that this is a strange reason to abandon a scientific investigation.

As a side note, I’d like to point out that there ARE recordings available on the internet of "loud" sounding explosions on 9/11, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Additionally, multiple people have alleged to having heard explosions with respect to WTC7. There is even an account by Kevin McPadden, Air Force Reserve medic and 9/11 first responder, who witnessed what appeared to be a countdown to demolish WTC7.

Look, here is the nut of it. On page 62 (of 115) of the Draft for Public Comment, it is written: "...however, the soundtracks from videos being recorded at the time of the collapse did not contain any sound as intense as would have accompanied such a blast (NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Chapter 5). Therefore, the Investigation Team concluded that there was no demolition-type blast that would have been intense enough to lead to the collapse of WTC7 on September 11, 2001.”

There you have it. Because they don’t have a tape with a loud noise on it, they ruled out controlled demolition. That is exactly what they are saying. Read the whole section about Hypothetical Blast Scenarios for your self if you want,… it starts on page 60 and is less than three pages long.

Now, Dr. Steven Jones has found physical evidence that thermite/thermate was used in the controlled demolition of WTC7. NIST did not investigate for this, nor did it conduct any research with respect to this kind of blast scenario. Additionally, a controlled demolition accomplished by thermite/thermate would not make the same kind of explosion sound as would be heard from a traditional Vegas-style demolition.

Equally important, and as proven quite starkly in this video, NIST did not account for evidence, both scientific and by eye witnesses, of the enormous amount of heat and the molten steel found beneath Ground Zero including WTC7, but rather denied it outright and refused to allow this information into their study. Had they taken these facts into account, their own proposed “reason” for the collapse would have been proven unworkable.

This is all far more than enough reason to re-open the entire investigation of 9/11. However, as shown here, and by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth here, here, and here, there are still other fundamental reasons why the NIST report on WTC7 is fundamentally wrong, and even outright lying, in its assertions and its conclusions.

"All war is based on deception." - Sun Tzu

Now I want you to think about the implications of the fact that WTC7 came down as a result of controlled demolition and everything that the "War on Terror" has touched, raped, killed, and imprisoned. Everything that Obama is doing in Afghanistan is based on a lie. The compartmentalized government currently in control does not serve the American people, but rather it is an enormous black operation serving private foreign interests. A coup took place in America quite some time ago, and it carries on to this very day.

Ministry - NWO
Uploaded by 666stev666

What if the Satanists were in the White House?

Do you think “Big Dick” Cheney cares about the safety of your nephew? Why didn’t he make a move to help the first responders of 9/11 who are dying from toxic dust? Instead, he sent thousands of military men to their death to SACRIFICE, while genociding over a MILLION Iraqis that posed no threat.

Do you think that George W Bush is a Christian? He LAUGHED when the evangelists left the White House, after telling them this and that, promising he would fight for Christ.

Do you think he was thinking of Jesus in the coffin at Skull & Bones? Do you think they ponder the implications of their mock human sacrifice of CARE at the Bohemian Grove, where the ultra wealthy and influential men of politics gather for their all-male brew-ha?


Now Obama is in, so it doesn’t matter, yes? Bush and Cheney are off on their exotic cruise to neverland, and it’s all better now, because the internationalist socialists will heal the wounds. Did you ever wonder why the mainstream media backed Obama like the golden ticket to Will Wonka’s Chocolate Factory, the greatest thing ever since sliced bread… the same media that sold you the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq? Anti-war? Obama is sending 17,000 men to Afghanistan because the dead bin Laden magic wanded building seven.

The bankers are in charge, and they own the media that backs our “change”. Obama is the healing salve that they offer you to prolong their torture.

They and those whom they serve want blood, and they suck your crystallized power (money) in an elaborate scheme of deception. They tell you this and that on the news, every single day. Like ten thousand magic users casting their charm spells, over, and over again, until you recoil.

They keep framing the conversation, and there is no way that this war and pumping $8 million dollars every day to Israel to conduct a prolonged cobra constriction and venom injection of Palestine has anything to do with your safety, but we don’t talk about that.

Problem Reaction Solution (New Version)

I think it is imperative to have a fundamental grasp of this concept, as it is apparently one of the oldest tricks in the books, and it is still being used on the unsuspecting people to this very day. This is a well done video about it (added to YouTube just last month).

NuffRespect (creator of the video): "This is a video that I originally put together in 2006, but I wasn't entirely happy with it. If you watched the original version, you might remember that in the description I said that I will do a better version, so here it is.

What happens in terms of creating wars is a mind-manipulation technique called "Problem-Reaction-Solution". And it works like this: Let's say you want to centralize power into fewer and fewer hands through the UN or NATO. If you did that openly and said, "This is what we want to do", there'd be a reaction against that. People would say, "Hey, this is a fascist state you want to create. We're not having this". But through this technique of Problem-Reaction-Solution, you can actually manipulate people to demand you do what you want to do anyway.

So it works like this: First of all, you create the problem, but you get someone else to be blamed for it. You then report that problem through the media in the way you want it reported - because the media is owned by the same people who own the banks, etc. You get the public to react to your problem by saying, "Something must be done; this can't go on; what are THEY going to do about it?" And at that point, THEY, who have covertly created the problem, and blamed someone else, who gleaned that reaction of Do Something, then offer the solution to the problems they have created.

So if you take the world wars for example - after the 1st world war, which the financial centers of London and Wall Street, etc, funded all sides, power on this planet was in fewer hands than ever before (via the League of Nations). After the 2nd world war, it was even fewer hands on the wheels of power. And as a result of the 2nd world war, we had the creation of the United Nations and NATO; and we had this great centralization of global power.

This "Problem-Reaction-Solution" technique is not just used to create and control wars, it can be applied to any situation where you want to produce a particular outcome. For example, this technique is currently being used to centralize power in the financial world. It can also be used to introduce new laws that restrict our civil liberties.

So, whenever you see some big news story - whether it be an alleged terrorist attack, a run on a currency, an accidental loss of people's personal data, an assertion that everyday people are causing "global warming", or an allegation that some poor country has developed nuclear weapons - the first question you need to ask yourself is this: "Who benefits from me believing this story?""



NOTE: If the video isn't showing up properly here is a direct link (where you can also watch it in high quality.)

I Dreamt a Bar for Apocalypse

I dreamt a bar for Apocalypse
And the Dawning of Aquarius
Front row seats for the Kali Yuga
…with Stolichnaya and Kahlua!

There’s a pretty lady, who is nice
Who has both sugar and spice
She’s serving soda and sliced lemon
…and it feels just like heaven!

Now I’m reading a strange book
And I’m casting an odd look
While stirring and listening to ice
…I think “now THAT would be nice!”

While the Masters are waging a war in the Heavens
With all of the Rays of which there are Sevens
But they will not join in to our affairs
…until mostly we solve the riddle of pairs:

It's the bar for Apocalypse
At the Dawning of Aquarius
Front row seats for the Kali Yuga
…with Stolichnaya and Kahlua.

It's the pretty lady, who is nice
Who has both sugar and spice
Serving soda and sliced lemon
…and it feels just like heaven.